"It is a good divine that follows his own instructions; I can easier teach twenty what were good to be done than to be one of the twenty to follow mine own teaching."
Portia, The Merchant of Venice, Act I, Scene II.



Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Words to Burn, Ideas to Ignite - More from NZATE Conference


Workshop 2 – The English Senior Secondary Teaching and Learning Guidelines – Robyn Holding

Perhaps you have never heard of the SSTLG??  Neither had I until the other week when Robyn mentioned them on the English Online listserve. I decided I had better come to her workshop and find out what it’s all about. In the meantime I had a quick look at them on tki. You can find the English SSTLG on Te Kete Ipurangi here.

So now, here I am and Robyn says there is so much in the guidelines that it will make our heads spin….


Purpose of the Guidelines

Basically to tease out the relationship between the ‘front end’ of the NZ Curriculum document and the English Achievement Objectives – the why and how of what we teach in our English classrooms. 

According to Robyn, SSTLG will be really useful for staff teaching out of field or for overseas trained staff who are familiar with the ‘front end’ of the NZ Curriculum document or have a good knowledge of another Education system, but need to know what the NZC is going to look like in the English classroom, with some examples (snapshots).


Rationale for Studying English

How do we answer the student who asks, “Why do we study English, Miss?”

My answers are:
  • ·      We use English every day
  • ·      We talk about the big questions
  • ·      We want to tell our stories
  • ·      We learn about life from others’ stories
  • ·      It’s fun!


Our group’s final five:
  • ·      Understand the world – big ideas
  • ·      Experience new things safely
  • ·      Express our ideas, thoughts, feelings
  • ·      Develop communication and critical thinking skills
  • ·      It’s fun, magical!



Ideas from other groups:
  • ·      So we are not easily manipulated (not suckers!)
  • ·      To understand the relationship between medium and message
  • ·      To understand myself and my place in the world
  • ·      To broaden our horizons and therefore our tolerance of difference.
  • ·      To foster creativity, expression and joy.

And
  • ·      To develop competency in the world through understanding and using English.
  • ·      To develop compassion and understanding
  • ·      To develop a sense of identity and follow your own interests
  • ·      To develop critical thinking – in all areas of life
  • ·      To have a good laugh (or cry)



This exercise made clear why the nine people who did this for the SSTLG had trouble agreeing on the rationale which ended up in the guide!  You can find this here.


Key Concepts

Also in the SSTLG are the key concepts in English, identified by English lecturers and teachers around the country, (drumroll):

·      Identity
·      Communication
·      Story
·      Meaning


English Achievement Objectives – the Strands

There is also a really good diagram which tries to explain/portray/analyse and otherwise show the English strands – see here.  I am going to copy this and put it up in my classroom!


Pedagogy

The most important section of the SSTLG is the section which focusses on pedagogy. This includes teacher stories  (snapshots) showing how they have done things in their teaching.  I can’t give you the link because we were seeing the beta version and it’s not up on the site yet. But it does look good.

Thanks, Robyn!


So I have an idea what the English SSTLG are all about now. I am thinking that:

·      They will be a great resource for HODs who need to support someone teaching in the English curriculum area for the first time;
·      They will be an excellent place to start for someone who was familiar with the old English in the NZ Curriculum document (the old ‘blue book’) but has been out of teaching for a while and needs to get up to speed with the changes implemented in the new NZC;
·      For existing English staff who have been living the implementation of NZC as it has happened, they will serve as a good reminder and resource, particularly for the Effective Pedagogy section (when it’s up) and teaching as inquiry. We could also be thinking about contributing our own learning stories and examples of pedagogy for the snapshots.


As an example of useful things spotted on the English SSTLG, here’s a PD resource you could use in your department meeting, showing the differences in progression in the Ideas aspect between Levels 6, 7 and 8 of the English curriculum, using Barack Obama’s ‘Yes, we can’  election victory speech.


Thanks, Robyn!

NZATE Conference – Words to Burn, Ideas to Ignite


Here are my notes from Workshop 1:


To Boldly Go… the new Level 2 Analyse Connections standard AS91104 using Science Fiction and Fantasy as a Genre base – Summar Austin, Pakuranga College

Why genre rather than theme?

Genre allows students to analyse the choices made by the author. Texts are connected by shared conventions, but may address different themes, which allows variation in text choices.

Speculative fiction, particularly SF, lends itself to study because of the way writers use metaphor to critique the world around them.

Eg. Terry Pratchett’s Discworld series provides a comedic commentary on our own society.  Kurt Vonnegut’s short story Harrison Bergeron explores the downside to equality.

Student feedback shows they enjoy exploring a genre in depth.

Summar gave out the task she used this year. She intends to revise this next year tailoring it more specifically to a genre approach, as students are more used to a thematic approach.

Poem Eugenesis by William McIlvanney – you can find it on this blog site if you scroll down – thanks Miss Macdonald!  introduce a stanza a day – students to write quick responses.

Text suggestions

Short stories:

  • ·      The Machine Stops, EM Forster.
  • ·      Asimov, Robot AL-76 Goes Astray
  • ·      Compassion Circuit, John Wyndham
  • ·      The Large Ant, Howard Fast
  • ·      Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow – Kurt Vonnegut
  • ·      The Weapon, Frederick Brown.


Films:
  • ·      Minority Report
  • ·      Gattaca
  • ·      Aliens series
  • ·      Bladerunner
  • ·      The Island
  • ·      Total Recall
  • ·      Terminator trilogy
  • ·      Space Odyssey 2001
  • ·      Barbarella
  • ·      Star Wars
  • ·      12 Monkeys
  • ·      The Day the Earth Stood Still
  • ·      Independence Day
  • ·      Mad Max
  • ·      Space Balls
  • ·      Mars Attacks
  • ·      Demolition Man
  • ·      The Fifth Element
  • ·      Vexille
  • ·      Lord of the Rings
  • ·      Howl’s Moving Castle
  • ·      Journey to the Centre of the Earth
  • ·      Children of Men


Novels:
  • ·      Do Android’s Dream of Electric Sheep – Philip K Dick
  • ·      Spares – Michael Marshall Smith
  • ·      Dracula
  • ·      Frankenstein
  • ·      Gulliver’s Travels
  • ·      The Handmaid’s Tale
  • ·      The Time Traveller’s Wife
  • ·      A Clockwork Orange
  • ·      Interview with the Vampire – Anne Rice
  • ·      Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
  • ·      The Wastelands, The Dark Tower – Stephen King
  • ·      The Giver – Lois Lowry
  • ·      Nineteen Eighty-Four
  • ·      Only Forward – Michael Marshall Smith
  • ·      The War of the Worlds – HG Wells
  • ·      A Picture of Dorian Gray – Oscar Wilde
  • ·      Brave New World
  • ·      The Lord of the Rings
  • ·      The Hobbit
  • ·      Eragon series


Authors for students to check out:
  • ·      Michael Marshall Smith
  • ·      Isaac Asimov
  • ·      Ursula Le Guin


Mentioned by other attendees:
  • ·      Feed, MT Anderson

Examples of themes identified by students to base their Connections study around:

  • ·      How technology is represented in Science Fiction
  • ·      The demon inside the hero in Fantasy fiction
  • ·      Representations of women in speculative fiction
  • ·      Different endings – representing the apocalypse
  • ·      Representations of dystopia in SF
  • ·      The changing face of the zombie
  • ·      The role of fate in fantasy fiction


Class texts used: Only Forward, Inception, The Machine Stops.


“I enjoyed reading texts that I wouldn’t normally read.”  - Student feedback.

Timeline – 2-3 terms
Needed to give time to write logs in class to get the quality – checkpoints for reading logs after each literature study. Time given to conferencing and guiding text choices. Some students relied heavily on texts studied in class, other chose all the texts themselves – allowed for differentiation.

Themes – Power & Justice; Action & Inaction.

Options to present – podcast, powerpoint, seminar as well as written report.

Check out www.sfsignal.com


Great workshop!!!!  Thanks, Summar!!!!

Words to Burn, Ideas to Ignite - NZATE Conference 2012

Kia ora koutou - blogging here from the NZATE conference. Below are my notes on the first keynote, which was totally awesome.



Keynote – Prof. Lyn Tribble - University of Otago - Why Shakespeare wrote ‘Shakespeare’ and why it matters


Robert Greene 1592 – Greene’s Groatsworth of Wit  -  upstart Crow, ref to Henry IV.  Shakespeare gets his own back with Polonius ‘beautified’ (that’s a vile phrase!) in Hamlet.

1593 Venus and Adonis

Individual quarto editions.

John Davies c.1610 dedication to our “English Terence Mr Will. Shakes-speare”

1623 – First Folio ‘only to keep the memory alive” etc. “Sweet swan of Avon”
Fairly early on after his death there are references to Stratford as a tourist destination – people going to see where Shakespeare was born.

There is more evidence linking Shakespeare to his plays than there is for any other playwright of the period, except Jonson.

Arguments against Shakespeare’s authorship basically boil down to:

·      Lack of evidence in his own handwriting – Tribble describes this as right up there with the argument that he never appeared on any TV chat shows. Written records which have survived from the period are mostly legal documents. There were about 900 copies of the plays printed during the period, so why keep the manuscripts? NO play successful and publically performed before 1642 survives in manuscript. With the possible exception of St Thomas More where there is a fragment which may possibly be in Shakespeare’s handwriting, but it is hard to tell when you are matching from a signature.  At the time it was probably thought that the manuscripts had no historical value – but at the time paper was expensive and scarce, and had a cash resale value.

·      Debate about education and experience – Well yes, there are no records of Shakespeare attending King Edward’s Grammar School, but then there are no records of anyone attending it. Shakespeare’s knowledge of the lives of the nobility and royalty is not necessarily terrible accurate – eg. Lord Capulet supervising the cooks; Love’s Labour’s Lost has people travelling from Italy to France via Spain…

Virtually all the young men who came to London at this time to write plays and poetry had similar backgrounds.

“Using the term “genius” to describe Shakespeare is in some ways accurate but also obscures as much as it reveals.”

Positive mention of Lois Potter’s recent book,  The Life of William Shakespeare: A Critical Biography.

Aaargh! Don’t stop now!!!! I could happily listen to another hour of this!!